Thursday, June 20, 2019

Policy Issues in the Criminal Justice System Essay

Policy Issues in the Criminal Justice System - audition ExampleIndeed, never before in history has the controversial practice appeargond to be under such a threat. These people consider the death penalisation to be a form of cruel and unusual penalization. They argue that it is a part of a barbaric ancient world and as such it no longer has any place in our contemporary world. This is a popular opinion. But upon critical consideration, the idea that the death penalization is cruel and unusual punishment does not stand up to scrutiny. Just because something had been used for many millennium does not mean it is barbaric or obsolete. People in the past knew a great deal about human nature Michelangelo, for example, painted the Sistine Chapel. He was not a barbarian. The justness is we need to look at the death penalty in the contemporary world and examine its effectiveness. We need to look closely to see if it is cruel and unusual punishment or if it is an effective and responsible itinerary to punish murderers and allow society to act as it feels is necessary in the face of certain heinous crimes. Society needs to be able to crap a statement about the worst crimes. One of the few developed countries to still use the death penalty is America. In America today metropolis punishment is legal in around thirty-seven states. It enjoys substantial popular support (Clark County). Most Americans do not entrust it is cruel and unusual punishment. They believe it is an appropriate form of censure. ... If it is crueland that is an open questionit is plainly in response to the cruelty of the acts committed by those who have received the death penalty. The truth is that there is a strong argument that the death penalty is a deterrent to those who seek or plan to commit heinous crimesthis would therefore unloosen those who suggest the death penalty is beyond the pale. The death penalty prevents people from committing crimes. No one criminal wants to end up subject to capital punishment and on death row. That is only part of the argument in favour of capital punishment however more than that, the death penalty is the ultimate dominance that society can take against those who commit the most serious crimes. As a whole society needs a mechanism through which to articulate their extreme displeasure at acts of extreme violence. This simply make sense. Many scholars also believe it works effectively as a deterrent (Mappes, 98). Those who paper criminology and who take a serious interest in this question, often agree that the death penalty has that kind of impact. The statistics, however, may not be so distinctly demonstrative. The reason why statistics are so open to misuse and manipulation by death penalty opponents is the fact that many murders committed by murderers are not actually first degree and do not involve a lot of premeditation. They often occur on the spur of the moment or by negligence. For these sorts of crimes, death penalty is not much of a deterrenceand this fact will be reflected in the statistics used by opponents. In fact, it is elusive to think there is much of a correlation between crime rates and capital punishment to begin with. Homicide is but a very petite portion of crime

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.